River Worth Friends
  • Home
  • Events
  • What we do
  • Meet our volunteers
  • Blog
  • Report an incident
  • Get in touch
  • River Worth Friends Policies and constitution

Monitoring the ecological status of the worth -part one - electrofishing.

6/12/2025

1 Comment

 
Picture
Measuring a brown trout, 260mm.
​River Worth Friends and the Aire Rivers Trust have been monitoring the ecological status of the Worth for a number of years. We have used two methods for this; electrofishing to count the actual number and species of fish and riverfly monitoring to count the number of invertebrates (bugs) living in the river, on which the fish feed. As we have been doing this for about five years we can start to detect trends in the numbers. In this blog we will look at how we electrofish and then analyse the results.
​
​Electrofishing involves passing an electric current through the water to momentarily stun or disorientate the fish, making them easier to catch, we then take a count and measure the length of some species. You may have seen us demonstrating this at the Trout in the Town Conclave we hosted earlier this year. Fishing usually involves a team of 4 to 6 people, headed by Prof. Jon Grey of the Wild Trout Trust who wields the electric probe, there are two catchers with nets who scoop up the fish when they appear and pass them to the fourth person who keeps them in a bucket of water for later counting and measuring by one or two people on the bank. I said that the stunning makes the fish easier to catch but the job of the catcher is quite tricky as the fish are only briefly immobilised so you have to be quite quick witted and sure footed.
Picture
Electrofishing team, left to right, catcher, bucket holder, Prof Grey with probe, catcher
​Once counted and measured the fish will be fully recovered and are released back into the river.
Five approximately 50 metre stretches are fished each spring. The lowest is by Kinara Close whilst the most upstream is at Damems.
​We asked Prof. Grey to explain some of the trends showing from the data over the past five years:
  • We have sampled the five sites consistently between years to standardise as much as possible so any differences are down to environmental elements, not the surveying approach per se. 
  • We would expect inter-annual fluctuation in numbers to some extent to do with differing conditions throughout the intervening year affecting various different life-stages
  • I've drawn up a bar chart denoting fish species number at the different sites over time. We would expect that there should be greater fish species diversity at the furthest downstream site and that generally holds but is clearest in 2025. There are a greater number of fish species in the mainstem Aire which 'should' be able to access the lowest reaches of the Worth. Over the five years of the survey, we have caught 8 different species: brown trout, grayling, bullhead, gudgeon, stone loach, minnow, 3-spined stickleback, brook lamprey. But interestingly the bar chart shows that the maximum we have caught at one time point at one location is 6.
Picture
​
  • At Damems, representing an upper section, we would naturally expect fewer fish species because of the gradient of the river and the suitability of the habitat whittling out those species that aren't able to cope. Of course, the Worth is challenged by weirs which further constrain that scenario. Damems has only ever had bullhead and brown trout in surveys and that is maybe a natural community for the river up there, although one might argue brook lamprey and eel should be able to get there if there were no weirs.
  • Complicating the picture of fish distribution further is the fact that bullhead and trout have sustainable populations above all the weirs and most of the pollution sources so can repopulate from upstream. Almost everything else has to repopulate from downstream. 
  • I say almost above. There seems to be a pocket of stickleback and brook lamprey clinging on above the goit and weir at Marriners walk which boost the species number occasionally
  • Still on species: gudgeon only appeared in surveys in 2025, and grayling appeared in 2024 with slightly more in 2025, demonstrating slow return of species to the river from the mainstem Aire but being limited by weirs. Indicative of this, minnow can be quite numerous in some years but only 1 minnow has been recorded in our surveys above the weir above the A629 at Aireworth Grove (we call it Malcolm’s weir).
  • ​For health of the river in terms of fish numbers, I've restricted the figure to bullhead and trout, and the general trend over time is that numbers of both are increasing at roughly the same trajectory. Bullhead numbers are much more irregular, being smaller species and with quicker turnover rates, and reflect that of stone loach and minnow to a certain extent. If we converted the raw numbers to density ie per unit area then the values would still be considered quite poor, but the trajectory is in the right direction and coupled with increasing diversity, seem to imply that the fish community is recovering.
Picture
​
  • The trout data can be explored even further, so in the last figure I have totalled the trout caught but split the numbers into parr (juveniles >1 year) and older fish, and the young of year component (fry <1 year). If we just look at the parr & older component of the population firstly, then the trend is much flatter than the previous figure; indeed, there is little change between 2021-24 and it is only in 2025 that the number jumps up a bit. Such a pattern might imply that the ‘carrying capacity’, the available habitat or food resource for older trout in the Worth, may be limiting. Interestingly, it is the fry component that has really changed over the 5 years of survey and caused the more marked upward trend in total trout number. Being the most delicate life-stage, fry numbers are extremely ‘noisy’, affected by a greater range of parameters and are thus more difficult to interpret. We only recorded one fry in each of 2021 and 2022. I know from surveying many becks across the region that 2021 & 2024 were relatively ‘good’ years ie lots of becks had higher numbers of fry but 2022 & 2025 were generally poor for various reasons. The Worth data do not seem to conform and may simply be reflecting the overall recovery of a river more able to support the earliest life-stages….watch this space!  
Picture
Our thanks to Prof. Grey for that interesting analysis. That last graph is particularly enigmatic, will the 2026 results show a continuing upward trend of older fish due to the recruitment from the previous young of year? We will let you know.
1 Comment

Hinging trees along the river at Damems

17/11/2025

0 Comments

 
People walking by the river at Damems recently may have noticed some riverside trees have been felled and left in the river. What’s that all about!? It’s part of the River Worth Improvement Project (RWIP) and is intended to improve the in-river ecology. Here Sam Riley-Gunn of the Aire Rivers Trust and project leader for the RWIP explains what it’s all about. Read on….
Picture
From the start of the industrial revolution, we have changed the shape of the River Worth from its natural irregular path to a high sided, straight, fast flowing channel. This has had an impact on the ecology of the river, making it less attractive to wildlife. One of the aims of the RWIP was to enhance the river environment for wildlife.
​At the Damems Nature Reserves, Aire Rivers Trust and the Wild Trout Trust have been introducing tree kickers to the River Worth. These are trees that have been felled into the river channel and securely anchored to the riverbank with steel cables. The aim is to mimic the natural presence of large woody matter that historically would have naturally fallen into the river. Though simple in design, these structures bring profound benefits to the river, its wildlife, and the surrounding community. They will restore natural river processes by breaking up the monotony of the artificial fast, straight, flows. 
Securing the felled trunk to the stump.
Felled kicker fully secured.
Winching the kicker into position facing downstream.
Completed kicker in position facing down stream.
Hover over image to read caption.
​

As water moves around and through the submerged branches, it slows in some areas and accelerates in others, creating pools, riffles, and eddies that reshape the riverbed. Sediment begins to settle in calmer zones, while gravel is scoured clean in faster currents. This is important on the Worth as its fast straightened flow limits the build-up of clean gravel beds that are vital spawning grounds for fish such at brown trout.
​
The ecological impact of the kickers is striking. Fish such as trout and minnows will find refuge in the shaded pools created by the kickers, while invertebrates will colonise the woody surfaces and new gravel bars thus forming the foundation of the food chain. Birds like kingfishers benefit from the increase in fish populations and use the protruding branches as hunting perches. Aquatic plants take hold in the quieter margins, stabilising the banks and offering shelter to wildlife. As the wood gradually decays, it continues to enrich the ecosystem, feeding fungi, insects, and plants. In a short time, the river will become more alive, with each species contributing to a richer web of biodiversity. Beyond habitat creation, tree kickers also play a role in natural flood management. By disrupting the speed of water during heavy rainfall, they reduce the risk of downstream flooding. The structures encourage water to spill into the floodplain, storing excess flow safely rather than rushing unchecked through the channel. ​ In an era of climate change, where extreme weather events are becoming more frequent, this kind of low-cost,  
Picture
A kicker created downstream about 18 months ago, note the gravel bar forming downstream of the tree.
nature-based solution is invaluable. It works with the river’s own processes rather than against them, offering resilience without the need for expensive concrete engineering.

The benefits extend to people as well as wildlife. Damems Nature Reserve is already a cherished green space, and the revitalised river enhances its appeal. Visitors can witness the transformation firsthand, spotting darting fish, flourishing plants, and the possible electric blue and orange flash of a kingfisher along the water’s edge.
​

The project also strengthens the River Worth Friends and Aire Rivers Trust’s wider mission to restore the Aire and Worth catchments. With the tree kickers marking the completion of the first phase of work to restore the Damems Nature Reserves. Future works are planned with Bradford and Keighley Town Council to introduce wildflower meadows, create fruit and flower rich riverside woodlands alongside an ambition to restore a large wetland on the Bradford Council owned section of the site. ​
Picture
0 Comments

Muppett’s Walk: Stanbury to Keighley Along the Worth

20/10/2025

0 Comments

 
A big thanks to Lucy Johnson for this lovely blog about the Muppet Memorial Walk organised by RWF for the Keighley Walking Festival. If you would like to write a blog on a River Worth matter please contact us.
​
Picture
​What better memorial to a much loved person than leading a favourite walk in their memory? As part of Keighley Walking Festival the River Worth Friends organised a walk from Stanbury to Keighley on Saturday 27th of September. This walk was advertised as “Muppett’s Walk.” At several points during the hike walk leader Sue Patchett shared memories of Michael Pascal, who preferred to be known as Muppett.
​
Muppett was passionate about broadening access to the countryside. He campaigned for many years to ensure access to the Dales bus service that runs from Keighley. He was good-humoured, invariably clad in Crocs, and passed away very suddenly last year.
PictureMuppet on a walk in 2022, in the middle with crocs.
​
​

​The Stanbury walk followed a route devised by Muppett. It was attended by 14 intrepid walkers, and led by Sue  supported by Malcolm Eldon, on a bright autumn day. Most participants met at Keighley bus station, where Sue was proudly sporting an eye-wateringly bright Walking Festival hat, the familiar River Worth Friends high-vis and jazzy trousers.
​
The bus route up the valley was scenic and calm, through a landscape studded with scenic villages, known for the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway and its role in the 1970 version of The Railway Children. We arrived as scheduled at the meeting point and acquired a few more participants, with only Malcolm and Rita sporting bare knees in the late September sunshine. 
​The walk was gently undulating and picturesque throughout. The most challenging element were the relatively frequent stiles, one of which had caused an uncomfortable impromptu dip in a small stream on a previous iteration of this walk. The stile has since been repaired, but if you were trying hard you could probably still have a mishap.
​
Photographs were taken at various traditional bridges, and at Lumbfoot, an idiosyncratically signed small settlement. Sue was keen to avoid the walk being an endless photoshoot, so she tried to rein in some of Malcolm’s more elaborate photocalls, in order to keep the walk moving and arrive in Keighley on time.
​ 
Picture
During the walk I mostly chatted with Sue, who is an endless source of jawdropping stories delivered in habitually dead-pan style. We ranged from tales of local campaigning, to her recent funded trip to a conference in Birmingham, where the food was not up to Sue’s very specific standards, and the state of railings both public and private. (Sue’s railings are yet to be painted at the time of writing, despite her continuously volunteering to paint various railings in the community).
​
I was intrigued to hear that in some respects Sue is a born campaigner rather than self-taught – her father spent many years lobbying parliament to protect badgers in the local area, and also went through a litigious phase trying to solve issues in court. As for how she manages to contribute meaningfully to practically every environmental cause going within a fairly wide area, Sue 
Picture
She's not going to creep up on any wildlife in that get up!
​commented, “I’ve got lots of faults, but organisation isn’t one of them.” She also said that she can easily spend four hours at a time on her computer emailing local councillors or uploading and updating photos. She commented on her abrasive, effective campaigning style: “You’ve either got it or you aint!”

​We continued over the gentle hills, mostly through green fields, with the occasional tweak here and there to add a bit of woodland or avoid a road. As we neared Keighley, we were treated to the deisel train passing at Damem’s station, holding us up at the barrier as Malcolm snapped a few more shots.

Picture
Diesel trains have no character!
The planned lunch spot was postponed due to winds, so instead we settled down close to the campfire spot at Damem’s Nature Reserve. Unfortunately, it seems that the spot is beloved by local dogs, who had chosen well-targeted spots to leave evidence of their walks, reducing the number of available perches. Sue regaled me with the escapade of Malcom’s Weir over lunch. It was detailed and dramatic enough to merit its own blog at some point, although Malcolm claims that the majority of Keighley is already familiar with the tale. 

​​Lunch completed, we continued back to Keighley, spotting ink caps on the way, and arriving back close to the train station to finish the day. Several walkers peeled off as we returned to the town, leaving a small group to bid farewell to near the train station. We were fortunate with the weather and the route was excellent. Sue proved herself to be a patient leader, even with Malcolm’s occasionally loose interpretation of back-marking. I highly recommend checking out more of the programme next year. 
Picture
Your blogger, Lucy Johnson, frightening the walkers.
0 Comments

About Otters on the river worth

12/9/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture courtesy of Rob Withey. Unfortunately not photographed on the Worth.
Everybody loves otters, except perhaps for anglers and pond owners! We have otters visiting the River Worth, here's a little information about otters in general and in more specifically about their life on the Worth.
​
Back from extinction.
​
​In the 1970’s the otter was close to extinction in England, only being found on 6% of surveyed sites. The steady decline earlier in the 20th century was largely due to water pollution with agricultural pesticides, other factors were illegal hunting and habitat loss.
​
Following new regulations to control damaging pesticides, such as dieldrin and aldrin, instituted in the late 1970s, and the passing of the Wildlife and Countryside Act of 1981 which lead to habitat restoration, otter numbers have steady increased. This has been partly by natural territory spread but also due to managed re-introduction in areas such as east Anglia where they were previously completely absent. The increase has been remarkable, in 2018 otters were found at 96% of surveyed sites in England.
 
Otters on the Worth.
​

​River Worth Friends are pleased to say that the Worth is no exception, otters or signs of their presence have been seen at a number of locations on the river.
Otter range over a wide territory, a female may cover 20-30 km or river, a male territory may include a number of female territories. So we suspect that the otters on the Worth are not actually resident but visitors from the Aire, we are hoping that an upcoming survey will be able to get more detail on this.
​
Is it an otter or a mink?

It is easy to mistake a mink for an otter and vice verse. Here are a few features to distinguish them:
  • ​Size. Otter are much bigger than mink, an adult otters body is about 95cm plus a tail of about 40cm, females are shorter. They weight between 7 to 17kg (15 to 37 lb), about the size of a medium sized terrier. While an adult mink is about 30-50 cm body length plus a tail about 20cm and weighs around 0.7-1.6 kg (1.5-3.5lb), about the size of a ferret, to which they are closely related. Otters have a much stouter tail which they use for swimming whilst mink tails are much thinner and less muscular.
  • Colour. Mink are much darker, almost black, otters are a grey/brown colour.
  • Swimming style. They have different swimming styles. Otters swim in a more submerged position with only their head and tail showing while the mink will have it's back showing. Also the heads are quite different, the otters being quite broad with a rounded face while the mink is weasel faced, narrow and pointed. Mink tend to be more terrestial than otters. The otter is more at home in the water than mink, it's body shape and webbed feet mean it's a more aquatic animal than the mink which is more often seen on the bank than in the water.​
​
There are brief videos of a an otter and a mink on the Worth later in the blog. They show the different confirmation of the mink to the otter.
​
Otter spotting.
​
​English otters are elusive creatures! They are mainly crepuscular, emerging at dawn and dusk, so they are usually out in the dark. The best way to find out if otters are present is to look for their spraints, posh name for droppings, or for their prints. You could also try filming with a trail camera.
​
PictureOtter spraint found on river in Keighley. Dried out a bit so light coloured
​

Otter spraints.

​Otters use their spraint to mark territory so it is often left on the top of large stones where it is evident. Often one stone will have a number of spraints. The spraints are cylindrical, about 2cm wide, a bit squishy and dark green in colour, getting lighter as it dries out. It will obviously contain bits of what it last ate, ie fish scales and bones, bits of insect and sometimes aquatic bird. On the Worth they will most likely have bits of crayfish (eating crayfish may also colour the spraint orange). Otter spraints can be confused with mink, however mink droppings are usually smaller but the best way to tell the difference is to have a good sniff! 
​Otter spraint usually has a sweet, fishy, some even say jasmine tea-like scent, while mink scats smell like shit, or some say burnt rubber .
​RWF members have spotted otter spraints by the river at Pitt St. and under the bridge at Dalton Lane, both close to the centre of Keighley, we didn’t need to sniff them.
​
Otter tracks.
​

​
These may be found in wet sand or mud along the river bank. Otter prints usually show five toes whilst a dogs has four. They can be confused with other mustelids such as weasel, mink and stoat but otters are much bigger, 9cm compared with 1-4cm We have seen otter tracks by the river near Pitt St.
Picture
Otter foot prints.
Trail camera.

If you really want to get into otter spotting you could set up a trail camera along the riverside. You obviously need to find a secluded location and camouflage the camera well, we understand there might be some dishonest people in Keighley who may steal it. Try to find somewhere with a gentle sloping bank, possibly under a bridge. We have filmed an otter in the river near Pitt Street.

​Clearly Pitt Street is a favourite otter hangout.

Help River Worth Friends. If you have any luck otter spotting we would love to hear from you. Any information will help us build up a picture of otters on the Worth. Report any signs or sightings via our contact page,
​
Brief shot of otter filmed on trail camera at Pitt Street.
Brief video of mink filmed on the same day and location as the otter
Otter facts.
​

​The otter family:       Otters are part of the mustelid family, so related to weasels, stoats, mink and badgers

 Size:                           A full grown male otter can be up to 95cm plus a tail of about 40cm females are                                                     shorter.  They weight between 7 to 17kg (15 to 37 lb).

Lifespan:                      ​Up to ten years though many die well before that. Nowadays the main cause of death                                           is road accidents.

Diet:                              ​Mainly fish such as trout, grayling, eels and carp (on the Worth it would be trout and                                            grayling) but also amphibians, crustaceans (lots of crayfish on the Worth), and                                                       waterbirds like moorhens and ducks. They also hunt on land, occasionally consuming                                          small mammals, birds, and insects. 

       
Offspring:                    Young otters, known as pups or cubs, are born from May to August, they are blind,                                               weighing about 100g (3.5oz). Female otters can delay implant of the embryo meaning                                          they can mate at any time but delay implantation to give birth when conditions are                                               right.
Picture
A pair of young otters, not on the Worth, these photgraphs were taken at the Strid on the Wharfe by RWF member Malcolm Eldon.
0 Comments

Deposit Return scheme to solve our drink bottle problems?

30/1/2025

1 Comment

 
Picture
One of River Worth Friends main activities is picking up plastic bottles and cans from in and along the river, over half of the rubbish we pick up is drinks containers. We don’t do this because we are obsessed with tidiness! Plastic is a scourge in our environment remaining for hundreds of years, plastic in our rivers will be distributed along the banks and eventually out to sea, having a lasting effect on marine life. The plastic bottle dropped in Keighley could end up in the stomach of a dolphin in the North Sea.
​
​So it was with a mixture of pleasure and disappointment that we heard the governments recent announcement about the proposed deposit return scheme (DRS) for plastic bottles and cans. We’re pleased to hear that it will be up and running in October 2027 but disappointed that it has taken so long for Britain to emulate many of our more environmentally conscientious European neighbours. The scheme was first mooted by Michael Gove, then Environment Secretary, in 2018. ​​Nine years to introduce a relatively simple but environment changing measure, our politicians need to get their finger out!

How will the scheme work? Well actually we don’t quite know, that’s still got to be worked out but basically when you buy drinks in a plastic or metal container an additional deposit (possibly 20p) will be paid which will be returned when the empty container is returned. This is limited to 150ml to 3 litre bottles or cans. Retailers will have to provide a return facility, either automated or manual, with certain exceptions.
Picture
In future someone could make a bit of money returning these bottles, instead of spreading them along the path.

​​The government plans to set up the Deposit Management Organisation(DMO) in April this year, they will fill in the details on how the scheme works and ensure manufacturers and retailers conform.

With British consumers buying over 30 billion single use drinks containers a year, this scheme is long overdue. Currently there are over 50 countries world wide running DRS schemes, European countries running schemes report an over 90% return rate, with Germany leading with 98%. RWF find that well over 50% of the litter we collect along the river is drinks containers. If the people of Keighley prove to be as sensible as the Germans then it will have a fantastic impact on our work. If not, well perhaps it will be a big boost for our funds!
Picture
Our first collection in 2025, at Postman's Walk. We reckon over 50% of this was drinks containers.
This scheme will not only have a huge environmental impact it will also contribute to the circular economy, with the collected bottles and cans being recycled. The government claims it will create 21,000 new jobs and £10 billion of investment in the recycling industry over the next ten years. We feel that it’s a pity that the DRS in England does not include glass bottles as it does in Scotland and Wales, if it did it would reinforce the circular economy even further and also get them off the river bank.
​
Let’s hope that the DRS and the disposable Vapes ban coming into force in June will  improve the environment in Keighley and also reduce the amount of plastic in the river.
​
1 Comment

RWF win silver award and celebrate the River Worth Restoration project.

17/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
RWF members and Paul Gaskell of the Wold Trout Trust (2nd from right )celebrate our Silver Trout in the Town accreditation on Low Mill Bridge.

​​​River Worth Friends attended a double celebration on Wednesday. We marked the completion of the River Worth Restoration Project and proudly received the Trout in the Town Silver Accreditation. There was a good turnout for the event at the Old Parcels Office at Keighley Railway Station.

​​Trout in the Town (TinTT) is a scheme run by the Wild Trout Trust encouraging local groups to improve the river habitat for brown trout, River Worth Friends are proud to be one of only five groups to have received the silver accreditation award from TinTT. 
​Some may say “Who cares if there are trout in the river”, but in looking after the trout we are improving things in many other ways. Good habitat for trout is good for the bugs in the river which is good for the birds and other animals that depend on the bugs and so on up the food chain. So a healthy trout population means a healthy river and bank side. The River Worth is something Keighley should be proud of and treasure.
​
Picture
Picture
Worth in winter, the Walk below Woodhouse bridge, what's not to like.
The silver accreditation is a recognition of the hard work of River Worth Friends and it’s volunteers. We run regular work parties on the river and our stalwarts turn up in all weathers, we rely on them.
Picture
Aire Rivers Trust, KWVR and RWF, Keighley Big Local and local councillors celebrate the River Worth Restoration Project on Low Mill Bridge.
​The River Worth Restoration Project was led by the Aire Rivers Trust but involved many local bodies; there was funding from Keighley Big Local and the Towns Fund but much of the work was done by volunteers from Aire Rivers Trust, Keighley and Worth Valley Railway environment team and River Worth Friends. There were four main strands to the project:
  • Improving access along the river by enhancing some of the dilapidated footpaths that are part of the Worth way.
  • Investigation of the health of the river with the help of citizen science volunteers. There were three parts to this:
    • Outfall Safari to pinpoint all the sewage outfalls into the River Worth catchment to aid subsequent monitoring of pollution.
    • Weir Walkers to locate all the weirs on the catchment. Weirs inhibit fish passage, affecting the health of the population.
    • Riverfly monitoring. Sampling the bugs in the river, they act like the canary in the coal mine, indicating pollution incidents.
  • In river adjustments to improve the fish habitat. For example felling and pinning trees into the river at Damems to create gravel bars suitable for fish spawning.
  • Raising public awareness of the river. This included signage for the footpaths, name plates on the river bridges and an interpretation board at the train station plus various events around the town.
One of the main outcomes of the project is that the river can be a haven not just for wildlife but also for the communities along its banks, a place for relaxation and reflection. 
​
Picture
A fisherman getting some relaxation and reflection on the Worth below Dalton Lane Brridge.
0 Comments

Fly tipping - a few facts and figures.

6/10/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Beckside 2020
Recently, during an idle moment, we were researching on the internet why fly tippers throw their rubbish over the wall instead of leaving it on the road side where we can more easily pick it up, we didn’t find an answer to that! But we did come across an interesting report dated October 2022 from unchecked.uk titled “Tipping Point - Exposing the realities of Britain’s fly tipping enforcement gap”.  It has some interesting data which can put Bradford Council's performance on this in perspective. Here are a few snippets from the report, with pictures of some Keighley fly tipping littered (geddit!) amongst them.
​
Incidents​
  • “Last year (2021) there were over 1,134,000 fly tipping incidents across the country – more than 130 fly tips every hour.  This compares to 820,000 incidents in 2010-11, meaning that fly tipping has increased by 38% in the last decade”.
​​​
  • “There has been a disproportionate rise in fly tipping in watercourses and on footpaths and bridleways since 2010/11; with fly tipping incidents in watercourses rising by 76%, and incidents on footpaths and bridleways rising by 97%”.
​
  • “Last year, the North East, the North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber suffered almost double the number of fly tipping incidents (relative to population size) than the South East and South West (22 incidents per 1,000 people, compared with 11.5 incidents per 1,000 people)”.
Picture
Damems Road 2021
Picture
Remains of cannabis farm below Low Mill Bridge 2022
Picture
Becks Rd 2022

​We are not sure why the North East, the North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber were considered the bad guys on this. East of England had 18.6 incidents per 1,000, West Midlands 15.2 and London 42.7.
Picture
Beck Street 2020
Picture
Leylands lane 2023
Picture
Damems 2021
Picture
Rubbish collected by River Worth Friends, Aire Rivers Trust and River Stewardship Company clear up at Mohair Street. 2019.
Picture
Sorting and loading the rubbish from Mohair Street clear up. 2019
Incidents
  • “Last year(2021), nearly three-quarters (+71%) of fly tipping incidents in England were not investigated by local enforcers, and 60% of fly tips resulted in no enforcement action whatsoever. This is a significant change from ten years ago, when 70% of fly tipping incidents resulted in enforcement action. Now it’s down to just 40%”.

​
  • “Statutory notices and warning letters issued by local enforcers have fallen by 68% and 69% respectively since 2010-11. Prosecutions of fly tippers are a rare occurrence, with English Local Authorities bringing, on average, just one prosecution for every 471 fly tipping incidents over the last three years, and Environment Agency prosecutions for serious waste incidents falling by 90% over the last decade. In fact, over the last three years, 1.75 million fly tipping incidents in England have gone unpunished by local enforcers”.
​
  • “The North East, the North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber, which see significantly more fly tipping than the South West and South East (relative to population size), have experienced the largest decline in enforcement of all regions, with total activity falling by 30% in these areas since 2015-16. Conversely, the South East and South West, which enjoy the lowest relative fly tipping levels of all regions, have seen a +10% increase in enforcement activity over this period”
​It is clear from this report that fly tipping is a national problem with regional hot spots and is not peculiar to Bradford as some would argue. The problem has got out of hand because cash strapped enforcement bodies do not have the resources to bring prosecutions. 
Picture
Aire Rivers Trust and RWF volunteers removing rubbish at Mohair Street. 2019.
Picture
River Stewardship Company workers preparing to erect fence at Mohair Street to prevent further fly tipping. 2019.
​Fly tipping and litter are a matter of civic pride, seeing rubbish strewn about the neighbourhood has an impact on how you feel about your community and probably about yourself. We need politicians to step up and say enough is enough  and fund increased enforcement and also encourage a mindset that makes littering, and hopefully fly tipping unthinkable. 
Picture
Mr and Mrs. Dalton Lane Bridge. 2020
0 Comments

What's going on at Marley tip? the story of one man's campaign for the environment.

28/9/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Major work to separate the river from the tip. (Photo courtesy of Rita Tretton)
​Some of you will know that work is taking place to prevent waste from Marley tip leaching into the River Aire. This is a £2m project which should be completed in November. River pollution from the tip has been an ongoing problem for many years, River Worth Friends member Kevin Sunderland has been concerned about the level of pollution from the site for over fourteen years and has persistently campaigned for something to be done about it. I recently got the lowdown from Kevin about his long campaign, here is a calendar of his progress.

​First, a little history.
The minutes of the old Keighley District Council show that the Council had asked for help in 1947 with the land that they were losing to the river at Marley. A point blank refusal came from the Ouse Catchment Board. The tip finally closed in 1963 about the same time as the incinerator was shut down. The land was subsequently used for playing fields. The land affected by erosion is at the Bradford end of the playing fields.

June 2011.
Kevin first spotted the way the river was eroding into the tip when he walked a new path at East Riddlesden Hall. He contacted Bradford council suggesting that they should test the tip for harmful chemicals.
April 2013.
​He got in touch with the Environment Agency (EA) about it but was told that they didn't consider the tip was causing a problem for the river. 
Picture
Kevin's photograph of the river eroding the tip, April 2012. Compare this with later picture taken in 2017.
August 2013.
Bradford Council finally commissioned Leeds City Council to carry out tests which revealed  high levels of iron, lead and arsenic throughout the tip. Bad news for the wildlife living in the river and those living alongside it.
December 2013.
​The council sought £400,000 funding to carry out remedial work on the site.
​September 2014.
Suspecting the council would not raise the money Kevin approached the Environment Agency again, armed with the results from the Leeds Council analysis. A more official response from the EA was received which stated that the EA was satisfied that the landfill was not having an impact on the river under the Water Framework Directive and that the site was considered to be very low risk and that they would stop further monitoring.
August 2017.
​Kevin visited the tip with a reporter from the T & A / Keighley News resulting in an article in both papers. Still no action.
Over the years he also contacted  local councillors but was unable to spark any real interest in the situation. 
Picture
Kevin's photograph from March 2017 taken from the same position as the 2012 shot above. You can see how much of the tip has slid into the river over the years.
October 2020.
After receiving advice from Councillor John Pennington (Bingley), Kevin approached Philip Davies, MP for Shipley. Mr Davies then contacted Sir James Bevan, Chief Executive of the EA, who told the EA in Leeds to   take another look at the site. Interestingly the EA claimed that they were not aware of any approach to them prior to 2019, despite Kevin repeatedly contacting them about it. The EA revisited the tip and found the effect on the river to be far greater than anticipated, resulting in the EA instructing/advising  Bradford Council to take action to correct the problem.
​
Picture
Picture of the tip face which Kevin took in August just before work started.
​RESULT! Well sort of, it has taken another four years but the work is now underway.
Picture
Seen from a distance you can see how extensive the work is.
This long story shows that campaigning doesn’t always bring quick results, but with a just cause plus determination, diligence and persistence you can eventually get a positive outcome. This will make a big difference for the river, its wildlife and those living downstream from the tip.

Hats off to Kevin Sunderland. Although he won't like me saying that!
​
Picture
The stone banking will be built up using stone gabions, there are some to the left of the picture. Photograph courtesy of Rita Tretton.
0 Comments

River Worth Dipper survey 2024

1/7/2024

1 Comment

 
Last year we did our first survey of dippers on the River Worth, see report, we have repeated it this year with more surveyors. Here is what we found......
​

Dippers on the River Worth - 2024 report

Picture
A good number of dippers were spotted throughout the system, but in many cases actual nest sites have proved elusive.  This is largely down to there being quite small windows when they are actually nest building, (nobody confirmed nest building at all - it possibly took place before our surveyors got out and about), and again when they are back and forth feeding young in the nest. 
Outside of these periods, the birds are there to be seen but are rarely giving away the location of their nests.  Thankfully quite a few fledglings were seen at the regular places, Morrisons, Damems, Oakworth, Haworth and Oxenhope, even if the actual sites weren’t always clear.  
​
​
Picture
Dipper fledgling
​We hope that when the Worth Valley Railway finish replacing their bridge at Haworth that the resident pair will move back in there.  On North Beck, there was much activity around Castle Mill, and confirmed breeding at Goose Eye.  Holme House Wood drew a blank again, we have to guess that is due to a lack of the preferred old stone walls/bridges for nest sites?
​

Picture
Demanding young!
​We didn’t have coverage on some of the upper streams, but a confirmed successful nest right up by Leeshaw reservoir, and similar by Ponden reservoir in recent years, suggest that we really ought to be paying more attention higher up.  It was confirmed that they have been up as far as the small stream through Newsholme in the past, but they didn’t show this year.  We had nobody covering Sladen Beck, nor the top end of North Beck (Slippery Stones and above), so if anyone is out walking these areas at other times of the year and see dippers it would be good just to hear from you.  Dippers are also reported as occasionally feeding round the edges of lakes.  We’ve had no reports of any of ours feeding around the reservoirs, so again it would be good to hear from anyone who sees this.  The Leeshaw pair were only seen feeding in the stream below the reservoir. 
​
​Dippers reportedly maintain their territories throughout the year, but can travel up and down a mile or more to feed, so although we see them about throughout the year we can never be sure where their home nest is.
​ 
We would like to thank all the surveyors who helped with this project. If you would like to help with next years survey or have sightings to report please contact us.

All the pictures of dippers are courtesy of RWF membner John Tickner
​
1 Comment

River monitoring on the Worth

4/6/2024

0 Comments

 

After a long break our blog returns with  Sam Riley-Gunn, Citizen Science & River Worth Officer with the Aire Rivers Trust, explaining how volunteers survey the life in the river to monitor pollution.....
​
Picture
Sam Riley-Gunn.

River Monitoring on The Worth

It is said that water is the source of life, however, very few people fully understand the diversity of life that exists under the surface of the River Worth. Some may have leaned over a bridge and seen a brown trout and others may have spent a happy summer day catching bullheads in jars paddling in the river. There is however a whole web of other life hiding in the river. The volunteers of the River Worth Friends and Aire Rivers Trust survey year-round to assess the health of the rivers hidden wildlife.
​
Alongside the Wild Trout Trust, we carry out yearly non-lethal electrofishing surveys and we have recorded a range of fish species including stone loach, brook lamprey, minnows, sticklebacks and brown trout. Understanding the numbers of these higher species is really important to assess how clean the water is, where fish become absent, we can safely say there are big problems with pollution. ​
Picture
Electro-fishing the Worth.
  
​​Supporting these fish in the food chain, is a whole host of river bugs that call the riverbed home. Every one occupies its own special place in the river habitat and can tell us much about the river's problems. Indeed these river bugs have been compared to the coal miners canary. In historic mining, a canary would be taken down a mine to provide an early warning system for polluted air in a mine, as they succumb to the bad air long before the miners would pass out and die of suffocation.  In the same way, the loss of small insects in the river can warn us there are pollution problems.
​
​ We have a network of volunteers working in pairs along the river to sample fixed sites, once a month between March and October. These riverfly volunteers look for eight groups of bugs in the river to assess pollution levels:
Picture
Cased caddis.
Picture
Olive.
Picture
Fresh water shrimp (Gammarus)
Picture
Caseless caddis.
Picture
Flat bodied stone clinger (heptogenid).
Picture
Blue winged olive.
Picture
Mayfly nymph.
Picture
Stonefly.

​​To gather a sample of these bugs, monitors undertake four minutes of collection, where they kick gravel and turn stones on the riverbed. This releases insects into a net, so they can then be sorted and counted in a large tray. The results are then logged on the National Riverfly Partnership Database for review by Aire Rivers Trust and the Environment Agency to help build a picture of the ongoing health of our rivers.
 
Where the results show problems volunteers are able to re-take the sample to check the results and report problems to the Environment Agency for further investigation. Essentially making our riverfly monitoring volunteers the local eyes and ears of the Environment Agency for emerging pollution problems. 
Picture
Kick sampling.
Picture
Checking the sample.
During the Summer of 2024 River Worth Friends in partnership with Aire Rivers Trust and Keighley Big Local are running a number of taster sessions along the River Worth and North Beck for members of the public to experience riverfly monitoring, with the aim of expanding our local network of trained river monitors along the Worth Valley.
 
We have dates planned through Keighley on Thursday evenings 7-9pm on the following dates:
 
June 20th – North Dean Allotments
June 27th – The Walk
July 4th – Damems Nature Reserve
July 11th – Aireworth Grove

Picture
Kick sampling amongst the rubbish on North Beck.
We are also running a qualification day on Saturday 13th July at Hainsworth Wood Community Centre, for volunteers who have completed 2 taster sessions, to achieve their National Riverfly Monitoring Certificate of Competence. This enables them to begin monitoring the health of the River Worth.
​
To find out more about getting involved and to book onto any of the sessions please head over to the Aire Rivers Trust website via this link 
Riverfly - Aire Rivers Trust or contact [email protected]
 
Not only will you be helping to check for pollution, it's also a great way to find out more about the ecology of the river
​
Picture
A handsome stonefly nymph from North Beck.
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    January 2025
    October 2024
    September 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    June 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    October 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by JustHostMe Limited
  • Home
  • Events
  • What we do
  • Meet our volunteers
  • Blog
  • Report an incident
  • Get in touch
  • River Worth Friends Policies and constitution